SABC News - Zero confidence in SA’s lion farming & lion bone trade :Sunday 29 January 2017

Zero confidence in SA’s lion farming & lion bone trade

Sunday 29 January 2017 15:16

Captured In Africa Foundation

Estimated 2 400 – 3 600 lions are bred in South Africa every year

Estimated 2 400 – 3 600 lions are bred in South Africa every year.(Captured In Africa Foundation )

In September 2016, CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) met in Johannesburg for CoP17 – a meeting of member states to clarify and review trade in endangered species. One particular talking point was met with condemnation from the conservation world, South Africa would be permitted to legally trade in captive bred lion bones – against the general feeling of various NGO’s and other African countries.

Non-Profit NPO Captured In Africa Foundation, along with various other non-profits, NGO’s, conservationists, economists and members of the public, will be submitting comments to the South African Government and CITES, following a meeting on 18th January, when the Department of Environmental Affairs announced that they would be seeking a captive lion bone trade export quota of 800 lion skeletons to trade to Asia and feed the Traditional Chinese Medicine market – lion bones are used as a replacement for tiger bones in tiger bone wine and tiger ‘cake’.

Department of Environmental Affairs media release can be found here.

Captured In Africa Foundation takes us through the DEA’s media release below;

May we first take this opportunity to applaud the South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs for their approach and tackling of illegal wildlife crime, trade, poaching, illegal hunting and other related activities. Our team understand the magnitude and complexities of such issues, which is certainly not an easy task.

However, Captured In Africa Foundation believe the DEA to be making a grave error in their approach to legal trade in lion bones, one which is based primarily on assumptions, with no clear research nor science and ignoring clear, unanimous research from the conservation & economic industry. The DEA’s proposal appears to be complicating what can and should be a much sterner approach to combating wildlife crime, including the trade of endangered species & derivatives.

As part of our comment to the DEA, we feel we must first revert to the Department of Environment’s media release, concerning their lion bone quota proposal and subsequent request for public comment. Our full comment will be made available online.
We have taken the liberty of quoting directly and below each quote, clarifying some irregularities and misinformation which may help better understand this absurd quota;

Quote

"An export permit shall only be granted for an Appendix II species when a Scientific Authority of the State of export has advised that such export will not be detrimental to the survival of that species."

Why?

Captured In Africa Foundation believe that such export permits must also take into consideration the global movement towards demand reduction campaigns and the emphasis & agreed approaches concerning a no trade policy on Elephant Ivory and Rhino Horn. We should ask why South Africa see themselves as acting separately to this global movement. South Africa’s Lion population does not account for an entire continent, therefore it is essential that all countries remain on the same page to achieve our common goal of saving the African Lion.

As per the departments’ media release, the South African Government are only now implementing research into Lion bones and their affect or otherwise on wild Lion populations. Therefore, and crucially, there is currently NO scientific authority on South Africa’s Lion bone exports, thus no export quota should be implemented which may risk the Africa Lion population.


Founder of CIA Foundation, Drew Abrahamson, assists on a male lion relocation. Photo by Captured in Africa Foundation.

Quote

"One of the main concerns is that lion bones may be illegally sourced from wild lion populations if the trade in the bones originating from captive bred lions is prohibited."

Why?

This is a false assumption with no fact or scientific evidence to support such risky endeavours. Poaching of wild lions for their bones is already a great and known risk.

In our experience, the above statement is misleading and only initiated by the lion farming and hunting industry to aid scaremongering. For the South African Government to perpetuate this myth is discreditable to genuine, scientific conservation efforts. If the DEA trust in such statements, we ask that research and evidence is submitted to support their claim.

“An emerging threat is trade in bones and other body parts for traditional medicine, both within Africa and in Asia (IUCN 2006a, b; Riggio et al. 2013)”, IUCN Red List of Endangered Species.

Finally, it is extremely difficult to differentiate between the bones of wild & captive lions. There is major concern that wild Lion bones could be smuggled as captive specimens.

Quote

"It was noted that when the trade in tiger bone was banned; the trade shifted and bones were sourced from South Africa"

Why?

The above statement is NOT a positive in favour of the Departments case for a Lion Bone quota, it should act as a reminder that when allowing trade, that trade can be exploited and therefore increase, further jeopardising such species – case in point being South Africa’s lion bone trade since 2008 and the resulting increase in exports.

Following declining numbers of Asian and Asiatic Tigers, poachers subsequently turned to Africa when Lions were seen as a suitable replacement for Traditional Chinese Medicine. This pattern persists and when a species reduces, poaching turns to other areas to source that species. Akin to South Africa’s current Rhino poaching crisis, with a slight fall in poached rhino in Kruger - however this poaching is now spreading to other areas & reserves of South Africa and surrounding countries.


Tiger bone wine is often replaced with lion bone due to the scarcity of tigers. Photo by Captured in Africa Foundation.

The above DEA statement vindicates the fact that, Asian nationals are sourcing Lion Bones to replace Tiger Bones – captive tigers were bred on mass whilst wild tiger populations were still targeted and reduced – the same correlation applies to lions in Africa, with captive breeding running parallel to reducing numbers of wild lions.

If South Africa joined the global effort to reduce demand and conserve, then Lions would not be in danger from the resulting increased demand for Lion Bones from South Africa – whether legally (captive) or illegally (wild) sourced.

Increased incidents of captive lions being poached (possibly for Muti purposes) in South Africa is also of concern. However we are seeing captive lions poached 2-6 lions at a time - lion farming should be restricted to allow due & proper understanding of this spike in captive poaching. Allowing trade in lion bones does not remedy this threat and demand for captive and wild lions.
The captive farming of Tigers quickly became out of control. Sadly Lions and Lion farming is going the same way.

Quote

"A well-regulated trade will enable the Department to monitor a number of issues relating to the trade, including the possible impact on the wild populations."

Why?

False & presumptive based on no scientific data concerning trade on Lion Bone – an already endangered species should not be used in such experiments. As seen with legal trade Rhino Horn & Elephant Ivory, proper monitoring of such an industry is not possible, with both Horn & Ivory being traded legally AND illegally through existing avenues by which the legal trade was able to operate. Applying a legal channel permits an illegal abuse of the system.

Legal Ivory retailers in Hong Kong, using loopholes to sell illegally sourced Ivory.

The Department of Environmental Affairs believe they can responsibly & accurately control the already out of control lion farming and lion bone industry?!

How can the South African Government regulate trade when the Government cannot control the products’ (lion skeleton) end destination? This is surely a total abandonment of responsibility?

“The Asian side of the trade chain is less transparent and understood, and little is known about the fate of Lion bones once they reach East–Southeast Asia. Since wildlife trade often makes use of the same established networks and supply lines, the Lion bone trade may have piggy-backed on existing wildlife routes in Lao PDR, Viet Nam, China, Thailand and possibly Myanmar, and is worthy of further investigation. If Lion bones are being traded between countries in East–Southeast Asia, then the trade is presumed to be mainly illicit given the absence of CITES export-import permit records to legitimize the trade.” – Bones of Contention, WildCRU/TRAFFIC

International Lion Bone Trade, according to respected authority Karl Ammann;

The Rhino Horn Trade comparison – “Supposedly one of the main objectives of South Africa discussing the possibility of legalizing the rhino horn trade is to flood the market with stores of rhino horn which will cause the price (currently U$ 60000 per kilo) to crash, decreasing the incentive for poachers.

This is the opposite of what we have found in our investigations into the trade in tiger and lion bones - the additional supply from captive farming, and the introduction of imported lion skeletons - which now exceeds by far the supply from the remaining wild tiger population - has not decreased the price, in fact the price of tiger carcasses has increased drastically in the last three years.”

What is the South African Government’s conservation purpose for legally trading Lion Bones? When it is clear that this will have a detrimental affect on wild lions, increased captive Lion breeding, negatively impacting demand reduction campaigns for wildlife products and trans-national organised crime.

Karl Ammann, ‘Of tiger and lion bones and the legalizing of the rhino horn trade’


South Africa breeds and exports tigers as well as lions. Photo by Captured in Africa Foundation.

Quote

"The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) will also initiate a study to monitor the lion bone trade in South Africa. The study will aim to increase the understanding of the lion bone trade in South Africa and the captive lion breeding industry"

Why?

Why have South Africa not initiated such studies previously, when the lion bone and captive lion industry isn't new. This proves that these industries have been allowed to operate and expand under no scientific research and under no conservation value for some time - notably since around 1997 when captive lion hunting was expose and also 2008 when South Africa began increasing exports of lion bones/skeletons.

South Africa state in the quote above that they wish to “increase the understanding of the lion bone trade in South Africa” – yet importantly make no mention of understanding the Lion bone trade INTERNATIONALLY, a critical component of allowing any quota. Therefore a ZERO QUOTA is the only logical stance for CITES to take.

To allow captive breeding of lions and captive lion bone exports to continue with a quota, without evidence of their merits, is flawed.

Other Key Arguments

• R20 000 per lion skeleton (x800 proposed quota), brings a total revenue of R14 Million. However the South African Government would only see a portion of that if anything, with the majority of that money going to lion farmers – perhaps only R4 Million – is this sum really worth it?

• In comparison, South African tourism revenue for 2015 was R91.8 Billion

• African Lion population is an estimated 20 000 in the WILD

• South Africa has an estimated 8 000 lions in CAPTIVITY

• Lions have been listed as endangered on CITES Appendix II since 1975 when there were approximately 100,000 lions in Africa. Appendix II listing allows “sustainable use” of wildlife through trade. What’s sustainable about losing 80,000 lions since 1975?

• IUCN listed African Lions as Vulnerable in 1996, with no change for 20 years.

• The IUCN World Congress in 2016 concluded that “captive breeding of lions has not been identified as a conservation action” – so why are we allowing an export quota for captive bred lion bones with no conservation value?

• Estimated 2,400 – 3,600 lions are bred in South Africa every year.

• Cub petting facilities help lion farmers externalise the cost of breeding lions, deceiving tourists and volunteers who come to Africa in the belief that they are helping.
.
• 20,000 lions left in the wild – South African lion farmers have likely bred that many lions or more just in captivity for hunting & lion bone trade.

Ending Questions

Why do CITES allow and permit such Lion Bone Trade, when there is categorically no scientific evidence of value nor support to conservation?

Do the South African Government have documented proof of economic value to South Africa and South Africa’s people, through any of its historic Lion Bone Trade exports?

How does South Africa’s proposed Lion Bone Trade quota assist in demand reduction campaigns the rest of the world is tackling?

If the Ivory market was proven to be suspect to loopholes and blatant disobedience to legalities concerning trade, how does South Africa hope to avoid such issues with Lion Bone Trade?

How does South Africa contribute to the overwhelming majority in favour of ending captive lion breeding, canned hunting, international illegal wildlife trade?

Captured In Africa Foundation is a registered South African non-profit organisation (NPO 176-604), established to support ongoing efforts for the protection, rescue and/or relocation of vulnerable and at risk big cats, both in the wild and exploited captive situations. Projects established and supported by the foundation include ongoing lion/big cat rescues and relocations, anti-poaching units, human-wildlife conflict management, educational programs and tourism campaigning & initiatives.

For more information on Captured In Africa Foundation, you can visit their website.

Share this page: Printer friendly version
 
SABC ©